by CB on Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:08 pm
I am a new member on here, in case you are wondering who I am .
You know, I told my wife, as Vino passed each time check on the ITT that it was very strange that he blew the time trial field away by over 2.5 minutes, after crashing, having 10 stitches in either knee, and being down over 28 minutes on the field just prior to the ITT. But, then, to support my claim even further, he comes back in a very difficult Pyrenees stage the next day, and wins the stage for God sakes with another 2.5 min gap? A time trial effort that resulted in that big of a gap, would not allow him to recover that quickly and go charging up the mountain the next day. So, thus, both efforts have now become very suspect.
I thought it was a bit fishy. Sure he lost blood from the crash, and I would think you might be entitled to a blood transfusion of some sort if you lost a lot of blood, so that might vindicate him. But, Jesus, this is ridiculous. This sport is going to be screwed. He was already sent home, and the entire Festina team has dropped out. The Tour is like 50% of the annual budget of an internationl team, so Festina has to be PISSED. Needless to say, this one is going to be hard to overcome, particularly after Landis last year, and the fact that we didn't start with a #1 this year in the tour for the first time in the history of the Tour.
Furthermore, it makes you wonder about Lance. He had a horrible day in the mountains a couple of times, particularly in his latest win. And then BAM, the next day, he goes firing up the mountain on all cylinders and secures himself a massive time gap that he kept to the end.
I have been riding/racing for over 25 years, and I have had bad days, followed by good days, and vice versa. But, when you are at the International level, which makes domestic Cat 1's even seem lethargic, it is almost impossible to see large gaps between riders at that level, without enhancements, crashes, etc. Sure, you have riders that are better climbers, and better sprinters, but to see dramatic shifts in performance from one day to the next, RELATIVE to riders of similar world class ability, does nothing but raise eyebrows, and it should. A simple study of basic medicine shows you that there are athletes that are far better than others. But, their peformance is consistently better, it does madically enhance 50% from one day to the next, without some physiological explanation.
CB
CB